19 - 2 - 2018 | 6:36
  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size
Home Conferences & Seminars Third International Workshop, November 2011 Exclusive Economic Zone in Major Media and Academic Journals in 2011: South China Sea and Other Seas, by Yearn Hong Choi

Exclusive Economic Zone in Major Media and Academic Journals in 2011: South China Sea and Other Seas, by Yearn Hong Choi

E-mail Print PDF

Introduction

Every coastal nation attempts to expand its sea territory by extending or expanding exclusive economic zone to the maximum possible. The EEZ was a new concept and a specific legal regime in the Law of the Sea Convention, building on the “exclusive fishing zones” and “fishing conservation zones” already in existence. The EEZ regime in the Convention was primarily aimed at living resources of the waters superjacent to the seabed. Although Article 56 (1) (a) stipulates that in the EEZ, “the coastal State has sovereign rights for the purpose of exploring and exploiting, conserving and managing the natural resources, whether living or non-living, of the waters superjacent to the seabed and of the seabed and its subsoil,” Article 56 (3) affirms that the rights set out in this article with respect to the seabed and subsoil shall be exercised in accordance with Part VI.” The EEZ is and must be an environmental conservation concept: However, it is  far from such a novel concept in reality. It is considered or interpreted as the coastal State’s privilege to claim its sovereign sea. Rights without obligations or duties have been claimed, rather blindly. This is something pathetically wrong or very ridiculous. Under the circumstances, 200 nautical miles of exclusive economic zone has been rather abused.

alt

Rampant exploration and exploitation of fishing and oil, gas and other precious metals have been made possible by constantly changing advanced technology and endless human greed for the nation’s wealth. Protection of ocean environment and conservation of resources have not been balanced or corresponded at all to the exploitation and exploration attempts of the deep sea resources. Beyond the Exclusive Economic Zone, a state may claim a continental shelf that is a “natural prolongation” of its territory for up to 350 nautical miles. Who knows? 500 or longer nautical miles will be argued in not so distant future.

 

This research work aims at finding of the intellectual focus and locus of the exclusive economic zone in the year of 2011—January 1 to August 31. What has been discussed on the exclusive economic zone in relations to issues on the seas and oceans? What has been proposed to bring peaceful sea and ocean and to protect the ocean environment and conservation of ocean and marine resources? Data base of this research work is ProQuest which is available in the public library system in the United States which collects 80 academic journals and major newspapers.

 

What is ProQuest data base?

Following is the information of ProQuest in Google:

 

ProQuest connects people with vetted, reliable information. Key to serious research, the company has forged a 70-year reputation as a gateway to the world’s knowledge – from dissertations to governmental and cultural archives to news, in all its forms. Its role is essential to libraries and other organizations whose missions depend on the delivery of complete, trustworthy information.

ProQuest’s massive information pool, built through partnerships with content creators, is navigated through technological innovations that enable users to quickly find just the right information. The company is currently rolling out the all-new ProQuest® platform, which moves beyond navigation to empower researchers to use, create, and share content—accelerating research productivity.

An energetic and fast-growing organization, in 2009 it launched the pioneering Summon™ web-scale discovery service, a boon to academic libraries worldwide. In 2010 ProQuest expanded into corporate and government markets, launching the ProQuest Dialog™ service and acquiring Congressional Information Services and University Publications of America. In early 2011 it acquired ebrary, expanding ProQuest’s content base to include e-books and adding to the technology expertise resident across the enterprise, which also includes such units as Serials Solutions®, RefWorks-COS™, and Bowker®.

 

Exclusive Economic Zone

 

Articles containing a key word, exclusive economic zone, have been numerous in ProQuest database. So this researcher limited the articles to those appeared in the year 2011. EEZ has created more boundary disputes and tense international relations in South China Sea than any other sea. Exclusive economic zone means just an extension of territorial sea to many coastal nations: 200 nautical miles of EEZ have been considered as the nation’s own territory, because it is an exclusive economic zone. Economic zone means every meaningful thing in the sea from the nation’s coastline. Economic means virtually everything. Overlapping EEZ is not to be peacefully resolved by two nations or more than two nations sharing the small sea in South China Sea and East China Sea or Yellow Sea. Creating EEZ may be one of the worst concepts in the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. Interpretation can be different from one nation to another, originated from US President Harry Truman’s executive order. Understanding current issues and problems of EEZ can start with a review of major scholarly and journalistic articles containing a key word, EEZ, in the year of 2011.

 

Content analysis of EEZ articles makes 10 groupings of the subjects below:

1.     South China Sea and China’s naval power

2.     Ocean Environment and Conservation

3.     Indian Ocean

4.     Korea

5.     Japan

6.     The United States and the Caribbean Sea

7.     Pacific Small Islands

8.     The Mediterranean Sea

9.     The Atlantic Ocean on the African small islands

10.   The Arctic Sea

 

The South China Sea

 

The most frequent EEZ articles in ProQuest were on the conflict and tense situation between China and ASEAN nations mainly and those among the ASEAN nations, Vietnam, the Philippines, Malaysia, Brunei and Indonesia. 43 articles were recorded in ProQuest data base from January 1, 2011 to September last, 2011. China provoked Vietnam when the Chinese fishing boats under the disguise of the Chinese Navy destroyed the Petro Vietnam’s survey of undersea oil and gas fields. Vietnam determined to go to war against China. Rhetoric of war did not go to the actual war, but South China Sea drew great attention from the world in 2011. China warned the United States not to be involved in South China Sea. The two superpowers interpreted EEZ differently: the US claimed that EEZ meant the freedom of navigation, including the US Naval ships, but China claimed EEZ was its own exclusive sea. It was and is a contradiction to see that Chinese naval ships freely navigated other nations’ EEZ. EEZ space was still different from one nation to another; There was no consensus between and among the nations that shared the small sea, the South China Sea and the East China Sea.

 

The China-Vietnam conflicts have been well known over the years and covered by major media in the world. In addition to China-Vietnam conflicts, the China-the Philippines conflicts were also reported in Asian Pulse in June 2011 (June 2 and June 3). Philippine Foreign Affairs Secretary Alberto del Rosario warned that “any new construction by China in the vicinity of the uninhabited Iroquois Bank in the South China Sea was a clear violation of the 2002 ASEAN-China Declaration of Cooperation” and complained that Chinese marine surveillance vessels were navigating well within the Philippines’ 200 nautical miles EEZ. Chinese military vessels reportedly fired shots at Philippines fishing vessels at Jackson Atoll, 140 nautical miles from Palawan on February 15, 2011. In March 2011, Chinese navy patrol boats allegedly harassed a Philippines-sanctioned oil exploration vessel at the Reed Bank, which is part of Palawan Province and not of the Spratly’s. In May 2011, MIG fighters believed to be from China allegedly harassed Philippines Air Force reconnaissance aircraft patrolling over Reed Bank. Malaya added that China’s structure built on the reef in the Spratly’s was a military one, not shelter for fishermen. Lack of trust between China and its neighboring nations was noteworthy.

 

China’s increasing military budget in double digit and abrasive diplomacy stirred its neighboring nations in the South China Sea and the East China Sea. China and India’s rivalry in the Indian Ocean was also discussed in a couple of major articles. The tension in the South China Sea is not an arcane legal issue, but a near and dangerous threat to the global economy and to the regional ecology. The sea lines of communications through the South China Sea connect Europe to Asia, making the sea one of the busiest waterways in the world. Almost half of the world shipping passes across it, and from Middle East a significant portion of Northeast Asia’s oil.

 

The South China Sea is also rich in hydrocarbons in various forms, and the full exploitation of these resources is hampered by unresolved boundaries and blatant military intimidation. Lastly, because of overfishing, there is a marked decline in the overcall fish catch, inspiring fishermen to use more aggressive techniques.

 

Some ASEAN nations proposed name change of the South China Sea to the Southeast Asia Sea. Ben Bland reported the name of the sea in his Financial Times article on June 21, 2011. South China Sea has been East Sea to the Vietnam people, West Philippine Sea to the Filipinos and South Sea to Chinese people. The South China Sea has been used so long by Western map makers without the Asian people’s consent and protest. It might be originated from the mapmakers in Europe who was not conscious of its probable long impact afterward. Naming of the sea is becoming sensitive to ASEAN nations, as it has become a sensitive issue of Sea of Japan to the Korean people on the sea between Japan and Korea. The National Geographic has accepted a dual name, Sea of Japan/East Sea. Some proposed a neutral sea name such as Blue Sea or Green Sea on the sea between the two nations.

 

Spratly Islands rich in hydrocarbons were the area of conflicts among the ASEAN nations, too. It is a sea space most complicated so that it seems impossible to resolve the conflicts among the nations sharing the South China Sea. The main headline of the Washington Post on September 18, 2011 is: Disputed Territory. It summarizes the conflicts in one sentence: China’s thirst for South China Sea oil puts it at odds with other nations’ claims (Higgins, 2011).

 

Searching for the solution to the South China Sea conflicts has been attempted by ASEAN-China declaration. Outside the ASEAN-China Declaration, I have noticed one academic proposal. Mark J. Valencia, Jon Van Dyke and Noel Ludwig at the University of Hawaii East-West Center proposed a common sea ground of all claimants, sharing the resources. Their single purpose regime is the South China Sea Institute for Marine Resources Management, conducting a joint survey and assessment of the mineral and hydrocarbon potential, and cooperatively implementing marine safety and surveillance measures. They also propose to create Spratly Coordinating Agency to manage the common area and its resources. Their product-sharing proposal is 50 percent for China and Taiwan and another 50 percent for the ASEAN nations. This may be challengeable by the ASEAN nations, including Vietnam. They discussed each claimant’s strength and weakness of the Spratly Islands (Valencia, et al, 1997).

 

Sam Bateman pointed out highly complex “wicked problems” that have defied solution and proposed a regional forum to solve the problems. These include different interpretations of the Law of the Sea underpinning regional maritime security, the lack of good order at sea, numerous conflicting claims to maritime jurisdiction, the implications of increased naval activity in the region and the lack of agreed maritime boundaries. His proposal is creating an Asian Peace Research Institute modeled after the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute to promote more independent thinking and greater cooperation. He emphasizes that the plan for action to implement the Joint Declaration on ASEAN-China Strategic Partnership for Peace and Prosperity (2011-1015). He points out that little progress has been achieved, though (Bateman, 2011).

 

The 2002 ASEAN-China Declaration of on the Conduct of Parties in the South China Sea (DOC) has set possible transformation of the area into a Zone of Peace, Freedom, Friendship and Cooperation (ZOPFF/C) through sustained consultations and dialogue. ZOPFF/C provides a framework for segregating the disputed territorial features among the nations surrounding the South China Sea. However, the spirit to achieve the goal of the DOC and ZOPFF/C has not been seen yet. They exist as “empty” promises or rhetoric.

 

All in all, the DOC, University of Hawaii East-West Center proposal and Bateman’s article should be guiding lights for the South China Sea peace and prosperity.

 

 Asia Pulse reported a story, a very interesting story to me, on July 28, 2011. This story reminds me of the South China Sea situation very well.

 

In the summer of 2011, Korean workers have been trying to raise the 50,905-ton bulk carrier, which sank in April after hitting a reef near Ieodo, some 150 kilometers southwest of Cheju Island. China sent patrol boats to the site last month and early this month and requested that they stop the work in its EEZ, according to foreign ministers officials. China has demanded South Korea halt its work to hoist a sunken commercial ship near the submerged rock of Ieodo in the East China Sea that Beijing claims as its territory, officials in Seoul said.

(continuing)

 

Read full text of this paper here


Newer news items:
Older news items:

Comments  

 
0 #1 Exclusive Economic Zone in Major Media and Academic Journals in 2011: South China Sea and Other Seas, by Yearn Hong ChoiIlse 2017-09-19 08:22
Whats up very cool web site!! Man .. Beautiful .. Amazing ..
I'll bookmark your site and take the feeds additionally? I
am happy to find numerous helpful information here within the
submit, we'd like develop extra techniques in this regard, thanks for sharing.
. . . . .

Take a look at my blog ... sdbullion: http://163.17.158.1/lunch/member.asp?action=view&memName=BernadineFreund868
Quote
 

Add comment


Security code
Refresh

Can a limited purpose maritime and air defence identification zone be established over the South China Sea?, by Mary George

Can a limited purpose maritime and air defence identification zone  be established over the South China Sea?, by Mary George

To stimulate South China Sea regional security cooperation in the control of piratical attacks against ships, this paper proposes the establishment of a limited purpose maritime and air defence identification zone over the South China Sea.

Read more...

Recent Developments in the Philippine Baselines Law, by Raul C. Pangalangan

Recent Developments in the Philippine Baselines Law, by Raul C. Pangalangan

The Philippines recently passed a 2009 Baselines Law that, it was hoped, would finally confront its long-standing dilemma on whether to abandon its 1898 “treaty lines” altogether and adopt the modern rules on the Law of the Sea. That hope did not come to pass.

Read more...

International Law in the South China Sea: Does it drive or help resolve conflict?, by Stein Tønnesson

International Law in the South China Sea: Does it drive or help resolve conflict?, by Stein Tønnesson

Abstract

The interplay of power and law in the South China Sea is not well understood. To analyze the disputes over navigation rights, sovereignty to islands, and delimitation of maritime zones we need to grasp how states define and defend their geopolitical interests as well as the ways in which international law influences their claims and conflict behaviour. This paper starts with the huge difference in interpretations made by geopolitically oriented political scientists and more normatively or legally oriented scholars. Then the paper asks how developments in international law have affected the conflicts in the South China Sea historically. It establishes parallel histories of alternation between periods of conflict and détente and of legal developments, both in customary and treaty-based international law. The main emphasis is on the law of the sea. The paper concludes by establishing causal linkages between the two histories, while seeking to ascertain in what ways the law as such has influenced conflict behaviour. Has it exacerbated disputes by encouraging conflictual claims? Or has it established rules and procedures that help manage or resolve conflicts? The paper is written on the assumption that the answers we give to these questions may influence the way we see the prospects of future peace in the South China Sea.

Read more...

Where’s the Stake? U.S. Interests in the South China Sea, by Jonathan G. Odom

Where’s the Stake? U.S. Interests in the South China Sea, by  Jonathan G. Odom

Introduction

Much of the legal discussion about the ongoing situation in the South China Sea focuses upon the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS)[1], a convention that was concluded in 1982.  During that early 1980's timeframe, there was an iconic television commercial[2] in the United States promoting the fast-food chain of restaurants known as Wendy’s.  The commercial showed three little old ladies standing at a cash register of a fictional restaurant that was competing with Wendy’s.  Behind the ladies was a sign on the wall that read, "Home of the Big Bun."  On the countertop was a large hamburger bun with an extremely small meat patty.  Each of the old ladies stared intensely at the bun.  Two of the ladies were admiring the bun.  The middle lady said, "It certainly is a big bun. It's a very big bun. It's a big fluffy bun. It's a very big fluffy bun."  The lady on the right, however, was wholly unimpressed with the large bun.  Over and over, she kept yelling "Where's the beef?" across the counter to anyone who might listen. At the conclusion of the television commercial, as the screen faded to black, the viewer could hear the third lady doubtfully telling her colleagues, "I don't think there is anybody back there."

Read more...

A Bilateral Network of Marine Protected Areas between Vietnam and China: An Alternative to the Chinese Unilateral Fishing Ban in the South China Sea?, by Hai-Dang Vu

A Bilateral Network of Marine Protected Areas between Vietnam and China: An Alternative to the Chinese Unilateral Fishing Ban in the South China Sea?, by Hai-Dang Vu

Since 1999, China has enacted an annual fishing ban for two or three months in the summer in the North-Western part of the South China Sea. This year (2011), the ban took place from May 16th to August the 1st and in an area between the latitude 12° North to the North and longitude 113° East to the West.[1]Any fishing vessel that goes into this area during the banis subjected to fines and its catches and gear confiscated.[2]According to Chinese news and scholars, this fishing ban is necessary to protect the sustainability of marine life in this area and prevent overfishing[3] and has produced positive results[4].However, critics, including from China, question the effectiveness of this measure. Many commercially important fishes are not breeding at the time of the fishing ban. Furthermore, after a long pause due to the ban, fishing activities would increase manifold, which causes more risk of depletion of the stocks.[5]

Read more...

Regional Cooperation in the South China Sea, by Jon M. Van Dyke

Regional Cooperation in the South China Sea, by Jon M. Van Dyke

The Duty to Cooperate in Semi-Enclosed Seas

            The South China Sea is a semi-enclosed sea governed by Part IX of the Law of the Sea Convention,[1] which says in Article 123 that countries bordering such seas “should co-operate with each other in the exercise of their rights and the performance of their duties under this Convention”  More specifically, they are instructed to “endeavor, directly or through an appropriate regional organization (a) to co-ordinate the management, conservation, exploration, and exploitation of the living resources of the sea” and also to co-ordinate their activities “with respect to the protection and preservation of the marine environment.”  The countries bordering on the South China Sea have failed to create an effective regional organization, and their cooperation “directly” has been generally unsuccessful as well.  The Coordinating Body on the Seas of East Asia (COBSEA) has been mostly dysfunctional and the Partnerships in Environmental Management for the Seas of East Asia (PEMSEA)has been modest in its accomplishments.  No effective organization to manage the shared fisheries has been established. 

Read more...

Resolution to Fishery Disputes in the South China Sea through Regional Cooperation and Management, by Kuan-Hsiung Wang

Resolution to Fishery Disputes in the South China Sea through Regional Cooperation and Management, by Kuan-Hsiung Wang

The disputes in the South China Sea could be categorized into two parts: one is on the sovereignty of those island features, and the other is the maritime zones that could be claimed. It is understandable that the best way to solve the disputes might be delimiting boundaries so that the areas of sovereignty and jurisdiction could be decided. However, such situation is not always possible. It is mainly because negotiation and adoption of a maritime boundary between the related States always focused on political considerations and there are no well-established laws for making boundaries. Although it is recognized that “equitable solution” is one of the most important principles in making boundary. However, there is no definite elements which have been decided, in spite of geographical and geological factors, coastal length, traditional fishing activities, relative impact on the livelihood and economic dependency are the considerations recognized in different cases.

Read more...

The South China Sea: Cooperation for Regional Security and Development, by Hasjim Djalal

The South China Sea: Cooperation for Regional Security and Development, by Hasjim Djalal

The efforts to develop cooperation for regional security and development, so far, has involved some formal approach of ASEAN and some informal approach by academic institutions and some informal unofficial approach by some South China Sea officials in their personal capacities. The formal approach has resulted in the Declaration of Conduct by the Foreign Minister of ASEAN and China in 2002 as well as by China and the Philippines, the Philippines and the Vietnam in formulating some confidence building measures or Code of Conduct between them. The informal approach has been initiated by Indonesia through the Workshop Process on Managing Potential Conflicts in the South China Sea since 1990. It should be noted however, that while the formal approach excludes Chinese Taipei in the process, but include Myanmar as an ASEAN Member although it is not located in the South China Sea, the second informal approach, however, includes Chinese Taipei as an “entity” in the South China Sea issues although no states around the South China Sea area has any diplomatic relations with the Chinese Taipei.

Read more...

The Internationalization of the South China Sea: Conflict prevention and management, by Leszek Buszynski

The Internationalization of the South China Sea: Conflict prevention and management, by Leszek Buszynski

Introduction

The South China Sea issue began as a territorial dispute over the sovereignty of the islands and sea territory involving China and five ASEAN countries, Vietnam, the Philippines, Malaysia, Brunei and Indonesia.  Both China and Vietnam claim the entire area and the islands within while the Philippines, Malaysia and Brunei have laid claims to contiguous areas based on EEZs and continental shelves and first discovery.  Had it been just a territorial issue it could have been resolved in some way as a product of Chinese efforts to reach out to ASEAN and to forge stronger ties with the region.  Later the issue involved access to the oil and gas reserves of the sea which became critical as global demand for energy rose and claimants devised plans to exploit the hydrocarbon reserves of the area.  Disputes erupted over the competing claims, particularly between China and Vietnam, which at times threatened to escalate.  Claims to energy resources need not result in conflict, however, and can be managed on the basis of joint or multilateral development for which there are various precedents and models though none quiet as complicated as would be required for the South China Sea. 

Read more...

Straight baselines around insular formations not constituting an archipelagic state, by Erik Franckx & Marco Benatar

Straight baselines around insular formations not constituting an archipelagic state, by Erik Franckx & Marco Benatar

I. Introduction

The South China Sea (SCS) dispute has proven to be a hotbed for a variety of juridical quarrels, ranging from the extent of maritime zones[1], to territorial insular claims[2] and navigational rights.[3] One of the outlying issues that warrants closer examination concerns the baselines to be drawn around mid-ocean SCS islands.[4] As a starting position, one would surmise the applicability of the regime of normal baselines in accordance with the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea.[5]

Read more...

UNCLOS and maritime security in the South China Sea, by Nguyen Thi Lan Anh

UNCLOS and maritime security in the South China Sea, by Nguyen Thi Lan Anh

Maritime security is a relatively new concept and there are several approaches on its definition within the overall concept of security in international relations. Maritime security is developed to emphasize the importance of maintaining good order at sea in terms of the use and management of the marine resources for human development. In a hotspot like the South China Sea, where sovereignty disputes and overlapping maritime claims are still escalating and complicated, the maintenance of maritime security is a vital issue, covering all aspects of traditional and non-traditional security. With regard to traditional security, the current tension and the modernization of army, particularly navy forces indicated that the parties had prepared for the use of force and armed conflict at regional level may occur. In non-traditional aspects, maritime and aviation safety, marine environmental protection, marine biodiversity and the maintenance of good livelihood for the people are among the fields that currently being seriously threaten. 

Read more...

Exclusive Economic Zone in Major Media and Academic Journals in 2011: South China Sea and Other Seas, by Yearn Hong Choi

Exclusive Economic Zone in Major Media and Academic Journals in 2011: South China Sea and Other Seas, by Yearn Hong Choi

Introduction

Every coastal nation attempts to expand its sea territory by extending or expanding exclusive economic zone to the maximum possible. The EEZ was a new concept and a specific legal regime in the Law of the Sea Convention, building on the “exclusive fishing zones” and “fishing conservation zones” already in existence. The EEZ regime in the Convention was primarily aimed at living resources of the waters superjacent to the seabed. Although Article 56 (1) (a) stipulates that in the EEZ, “the coastal State has sovereign rights for the purpose of exploring and exploiting, conserving and managing the natural resources, whether living or non-living, of the waters superjacent to the seabed and of the seabed and its subsoil,” Article 56 (3) affirms that the rights set out in this article with respect to the seabed and subsoil shall be exercised in accordance with Part VI.” The EEZ is and must be an environmental conservation concept: However, it is  far from such a novel concept in reality. It is considered or interpreted as the coastal State’s privilege to claim its sovereign sea. Rights without obligations or duties have been claimed, rather blindly. This is something pathetically wrong or very ridiculous. Under the circumstances, 200 nautical miles of exclusive economic zone has been rather abused.

Read more...

Growing tension in South China Sea – Causes and Cures, by S. D. Pradhan

Growing tension in South China Sea – Causes and Cures, by S. D. Pradhan

The recent escalation in tension in South China Sea has indicated the need for objectively looking at the causes of dispute and the recent developments both negative and positive with a view to suggest measures todiffuse the situation, which according to some security experts has the potentials to escalate into an armed conflict and to help the involved nations to find a permanent solution.

Read more...

Abstract of The Risk of Applying Realpolitik in Resolving the South China Sea Dispute: Possible Implications on Regional Security. by Renato De Castro

Abstract of The Risk of Applying Realpolitik in Resolving the South China Sea Dispute: Possible Implications on Regional Security. by Renato De Castro

Located in the heart of Southeast Asia, the South China Sea is a semi-enclosed sea surrounded by China and several smaller and weaker Southeast Asian powers such as the Philippines, Vietnam, Malaysia, and Brunei.  Since the mid-1970s, these littoral states have been locked in a chronic competition as each one seek to extend its sovereignty and jurisdictional claims over more than a hundred islets, reefs, and rocks and their surrounding waters.  The biggest among the claimant states, China has shown propensity to use coercive diplomacy and even actual force to pursue its territorial claims.   In 1974, its forces drove the South Vietnamese from the Paracel Islands north of the Spratlys. Then in 1988, Chinese forces dislodged Vietnamese forces from Johnson Reef, after they sunk three Vietnamese trawlers near Fiery Cross Reef.  China’s promulgation of a territorial law claiming a large portion of the South China Sea in 1992, and Manila’s discovery of Chinese military structures on Mischief Reef in 1995 triggered a serious diplomatic row between the Philippines and China in the mid-1990s.

Read more...

South China Sea: China’s Rise and Implications for Security Cooperation, by Koichi Sato

South China Sea: China’s Rise and Implications for Security Cooperation, by Koichi Sato

In March 2010[1], Chinese diplomats told senior Obama administration officials that China (People’s Republic of China: PRC) would not tolerate any interference in the South China Sea, now part of China’s “core interest” of sovereignty. The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) navy and the Chinese maritime security agencies have begun to deploy their battleships and patrol boats in the South China Sea. Tensions between China and its Southeast Asian neighbors are on the rise. The United States, Japan, and Australia also show concern for the security of Sea Lines of Communication (SLOC) in the South China Sea. It is also said that the PLA navy has a plan to develop aircraft carriers. This paper analyzes these maritime challenges and explores implications for the security cooperation between China and its neighboring countries including Japan and the United States.

Read more...
More:

Language

South China Sea Studies

Joomla Slide Menu by DART Creations

Special Publication

 

Search

Login Form

Subscribe form

Top Photo Galleries

Web Links

VIETNAM MOFA SPOKESPERSON

 

NATIONAL BOUNDARIES